Canonical Wago documentation

Wago compared with wazero

A scoped, source-linked comparison of Wago and wazero, including when to choose either runtime and what has not been benchmarked.

Last synchronized: 2026-07-30 Wago source: 7d8c58aa454a

Short answer

Choose Wago when you are evaluating Wago’s single-pass compile latency, instance-allocation profile, plugin model, or its current benchmarked host-call path.

Choose wazero when you need a stable v1 API promise, a mature pure-Go runtime with a broader production history, or a portable interpreter on additional Go targets.

Operational differences

Area	Wago	wazero
Implementation	Go; no cgo	See the project’s current implementation and bindings
Execution terminology	Single-pass native compiler	Go-native compiler backend, with a portable interpreter fallback
Wago release maturity	Pre-v1 development/nightly channels; no stable v1 API promise	See the other project’s release and support policy
Known Wago gap	Wago is pre-v1 and does not match wazero’s platform breadth or published API-stability promise.	Not applicable

Benchmark scope

Wago publishes architecture-specific direct comparisons with wazero; see the homepage and project.json.

No result on this page should be treated as universal. Use identical versions, hardware, Wasm modules, warmup, and measurement boundaries.

Raw Wago data: project.json. Other-runtime primary source: https://github.com/tetratelabs/wazero.

Verification date

Wago facts: 2026-07-30, pinned to 7d8c58aa454a. Competitor descriptions last reviewed against the linked primary project source on 2026-07-29.